[Subversion] / PEAK / TODO.txt  

View of /PEAK/TODO.txt

Parent Directory | Revision Log
Revision: 1518 - (download)
Wed Dec 3 04:08:12 2003 UTC (20 years, 4 months ago) by tsarna
File size: 6286 byte(s)
Give peak.running.tools a promotion... it's now just peak.tools
Open Issues/To-Do Items

 Targeted for 0.5 Alpha 3

    * peak.binding

       - Cleanup/document attribute binding interface

       - Investigate whether suggestParentComponent() should be suppressed when
         the value is computed by the binding, or if perhaps 'suggestParent'
         should be set to 'False' by default for some kinds of bindings.

    * peak.running.logs

      - Separate formatters from publishers

      - Configurable EventClass

      - Loggers know their names and pass that info to event constructor

      - Events should use standard IComponentFactory constructor interface

    * peak.web (some of this may get bumped to alpha 4)

       - fix 'text' DOMlet quoting (i.e., the lack thereof)

       - clean up DOMlet parse/build framework (e.g. add line number info)

       - default error templates, w/useful info

       - Refactor skin/layer/resource machinery so that layers can be shared
         between skins (because i18n will probably want skins and that's going
         to greatly multiply memory requirements)

       - A set of simple, basic form controls that handle value rendering only
         (form metadata, validation, etc. will be handled by peak.web.forms in
         a later release)

       - try/catch DOMlet (and related error rendering interface/framework)


    * Misc.

      - API consolidation? (some users only want core API's in peak.api)


 Targeted for 0.5 Alpha 4

    * Transaction/storage refactorings

      - transaction scopes for commands and tasks

      - integrate locks with transactions

      - transactable persistent queues

      - DM.find()/DM.get() queries


    * peak.web

       - allow use of // in DOMlets' data paths, to access resource space

       - DOMlets for layout/region, as defined in "A layout framework":http://www.eby-sarna.com/pipermail/transwarp/2003-August/000684.html

       - conditional GET support (last modified/ETag) for static resources

       - image resources

       - the return of the Specialist

    * Have a way to easily in-line custom component usage (e.g. automatically
      create a subclass component with specified 'Obtain' or 'Make' bindings to
      get its configuration).

    * Implement "contextual protocols" (c.f. "object teams") and "parameterized
      protocols" (E.g. 'ListOf(IFoo)', 'MappingOf(keys=IBar,values=IBaz)')



 Targeted for 0.5 Beta 1

    * Up-to-date reference docstrings for all packages

    * Finish tutorial chapter 2 (?)

    * Web publishing framework sufficient to deploy page-based or object-
      published apps



 Targeted for 0.5 Final Release (or sooner)

    peak.storage

        - unit tests for more complex object scenarios: references, thunks..?

    peak.naming

        - useful example "flat" naming context (e.g. like AppUtils.URLkeys)

        - useful example hierarchical naming context (e.g. like JNDI's LDAP
          context or a filesystem context)

        - rework smtp: to return a factory object that supports open().
          Also think about whether smtp should move to peak.net?















 Targeted for version 0.6

   * Get XMI writing in place, w/transaction support

   * Generate UML 1.5 and CWM 1.0 and 1.1, and add them to the
     'setup.py' package lists.

   * On-the-fly class combination (think "runtime module inheritance",
     but possibly without the modules) for DMs.

   * Lock management interfaces/API for peak.storage

   * Make 'cluster' parser complain about things that would cause
     the clusterit tools to choke or barf on the file, or which would
     produce ambiguous or unintended results.  (Or replace with ZConfig
     schema that can generate clusterit files.  And/or replace clusterit
     tools with PEAK ones.)
























 Future Releases

  (Note: some of the below is held-over from TransWarp and may no longer be
  relevant as written, they are being kept on this list as placeholders for
  ideas or problem areas that may need to be re-considered in future.)

  Miscellaneous

    * Functional tests that access "real" databases, LDAP, etc.

  Simulator/Module Inheritance

    * Allow 'declareModule()' to bootstrap non-existent modules; this might
      let us create "virtual packages" made by assembling other packages and
      modules.

    * Need a strategy for handling "del" operations; they are currently
      untrapped.  This might be okay under most circumstances, but need to
      consider edge cases.

    * 'makeClass()' should probably become part of the core API, where
      it can be used to resolve __metaclass__ conflicts during the first
      pass of importing a module (prior to running 'setupModule()')


  Messaging/ObjectSpaces

    * Support for sending and receiving remote cache invalidation
      messages between DataManagers.












  peak.model

    * Implement WarpCORE-oriented structural model, w/Querying support

    * "Indexed" version of in-memory model?


    Queries

       * Refactor to use interfaces, if appropriate

       * Incorporate into AbstractModel?

         - Pros:

           * Queries always available

           * Each StructuralModel implementation can easily include its own
             performance-tuned version of the basic items.

         - Con: default implementation doesn't perform well on large datasets

       * How much of framework needs extensibility?  Should the predicate
         classes be placed in the StructuralModel's namespace so that predicates
         have their meaning assigned by the StructuralModel implementation?
















  peak.metamodels.uml

    * Helper methods in Elements & Services for marshalling, common queries, etc.

    * Generator framework

      - Tagged values in stereotypes vs. main values?

      - Should tagged values be copied directly into templates?  Treated as
        Python expressions?

      - Should Services be generated using an Element class' "static"
        (class-scope) methods/attributes?

        - Are association-ends scoped?

        - Would it be better to seperate them?

      - What determines whether an implemented Service actually stores objects
        or delegates this to its subclass services?

    * Simple demo (browse XMI model via the web)




















cvs-admin@eby-sarna.com

Powered by ViewCVS 1.0-dev

ViewCVS and CVS Help