Doc overhaul, and rename ObserverCell->Performer
----------------------------------------------------------------- Time, Event Loops, and Tasks: The ``peak.events.activity`` Module ----------------------------------------------------------------- For basic uses of the Trellis, no event loop is needed. Rules simply re-run whenever their input values change. However, for programs that require timeouts or delays, or want to do multi-tasking (either using threads or co-routine generators), a little more sophistication is required. The ``peak.events.activity`` module provides services that can wrap just about any sort of event loop (e.g. Twisted, wx, etc.), and allow you to implement your own as well. It also provides various "time" services for managing timeouts and delays, that integrate with the event loop services to fire rules at appropriate times. Last, but not least, it provides a co-operative multitasking facility that lets you create and run as many pseudo-threads as you want, using Python generator functions. >>> from peak.events import trellis, activity .. contents:: **Table of Contents** Managing Activities in "Clock Time" =================================== Real-life applications often need to work with intervals of physical or "real" time, not just logical "Trellis time". In addition, they often need to manage sequential or simultaneous activities. For example, a desktop application may have background tasks that perform synchronization, download mail, etc. A server application may have logical tasks handling requests, and so on. These activities may need to start or stop at various times, manage timeouts, display or log progress, etc. So, the ``peak.events.activity`` module includes support for time tracking as well as controlling activities and monitoring their progress. Timers and the Time Service --------------------------- The Trellis measures time using "timers". A timer represents a moment in time, but you can't tell directly *what* moment it represents. All you can do is measure the interval between two timers, or tell whether the moment defined by a timer has been reached. The "zero" timer is ``activity.EPOCH``, representing an arbitrary starting point in relative time:: >>> t = activity.EPOCH >>> t <...activity._Timer object at ...> Static Time Calculations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ As you can see, timer objects aren't very informative by themselves. However, you can use subscripting to create new timers relative to an existing timer, and subtract timers from each other to produce an interval in seconds, e.g.:: >>> t10 = t[10] >>> t10 - t 10 >>> t10[-10] - t 0 >>> t10[3] - t 13 Timers compare equal to one another, if and only if they represent the same moment:: >>> t==t True >>> t!=t False >>> t10[-10] == t True >>> t10[-10] != t False And the other comparison operators work on timers according to their relative positions in time, e.g.: >>> t[-1] < t <= t[1] True >>> t[-1] > t[-2] True >>> t[-2] > t[-1] False >>> t[-1] >= t[-1] True >>> t<=t True >>> t<=t[1] True >>> t<=t[-1] False Dynamic Time Calculations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Of course, if arithmetic were all you could do with timers, they wouldn't be very useful. Their real value comes when you perform dynamic time calculations, to answer questions like "How long has it been since X happened?", or "Has Y seconds elapsed since X happened?" And of course, we want any rules that ask these questions to be recalculated if the answers change! This is where the ``activity.Time`` service comes into play. The ``Time`` class is a ``context.Service`` (see the `Contextual docs`_ for more details) that tracks the current time, and takes care of letting the Trellis know when a rule needs to be recalculated because of a change in the current time. .. _Contextual docs: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Contextual By default, the ``Time`` service uses ``time.time()`` to track the current time, whenever a trellis value is changed. But to get consistent timings while testing, we'll turn this automatic updating off:: >>> from peak.events.activity import Time >>> Time.auto_update = False With auto-update off, the time will only advance if we explicitly call ``Time.tick()`` or ``Time.advance()``. ``tick()`` updates the current time to match ``time.time()``, while ``Time.advance()`` moves the time ahead by a specified amount (so you can run tests in "simulated time" with perfect repeatability). So now let's do some dynamic time calculations. In most programs, what you need to know in a rule is whether a certain amount of time has elapsed since something has happened, or whether a certain future time has arrived. To do that, you can simply create a timer for the desired moment, and check its boolean (truth) value:: >>> twenty = Time[20] # go off 20 secs. from now >>> bool(twenty) # but we haven't gone off yet False >>> Time.advance(5) >>> bool(twenty) # not time yet... False >>> Time.advance(15) # bingo! >>> bool(twenty) True >>> Time.advance(7) >>> bool(twenty) # remains true even after the exact moment has passed True And of course, you can use this boolean test in a rule, to trigger some action:: >>> class AlarmClock(trellis.Component): ... timeout = trellis.attr(None) ... trellis.maintain() ... def alert(self): ... if self.timeout: ... print "timed out!" >>> clock = AlarmClock(timeout=Time[20]) >>> Time.advance(15) >>> Time.advance(15) timed out! Notice, by the way, that the ``Time`` service can be subscripted with a value in seconds, to get a timer representing that many seconds from the current time. (However, ``Time`` is not really a timer object, so don't try to use it as one!) Elapsed Time Tracking ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This alarm implementation works by getting a future timer (``timeout``), and then "goes off" when that future moment is reached. However, we can also create an "elapsed" timer, and trigger when a certain amount of time has passed:: >>> class Elapsed(trellis.Component): ... duration = trellis.attr(20) ... has_run_for = trellis.maintain(lambda self: Time[0]) ... trellis.maintain() ... def alarm(self): ... if self.has_run_for[self.duration]: ... print "timed out!" >>> t = Elapsed() # Capture a start time >>> Time.advance(15) # duration is 20, so no alarm yet >>> t.duration = 10 # duration changed, and already reached timed out! >>> t.duration = 15 # duration changed, but still reached timed out! >>> t.duration = 20 # not reached yet... >>> Time.advance(5) timed out! As you can see, the ``has_run_for`` attribute is a timer that records the moment when the ``Elapsed`` instance is created. The ``alarm`` rule is then recalculated whenever the ``duration`` changes -- or elapses. Of course, in complex programs, one usually needs to be able to measure the amount of time that some condition has been true (or false). For example, how long a process has been idle (or busy):: >>> class IdleTimer(trellis.Component): ... trellis.attrs( ... idle_timeout = 20, ... busy = False, ... ) ... idle_for = trellis.maintain( ... lambda self: self.idle_for.begins_with(not self.busy), ... initially = activity.NOT_YET ... ) ... trellis.maintain() ... def alarm(self): ... if self.idle_for[self.idle_timeout]: ... print "timed out!" The way this code works, is that initially the ``idle_for`` timer is equal to the special ``NOT_YET`` value, representing a moment that will never be reached. The ``begins_with()`` method of timer objects takes a boolean value. If the value is false, ``NOT_YET`` is returned. If the value is true, the lesser of the existing timer value or ``Time[0]`` (the present moment) is returned. Thus, a statement like:: a_timer = a_timer.begins_with(condition) ensures that ``a_timer`` equals the most recent moment at which ``condition`` was observed to become true. (Or ``NOT_YET``, in the case where ``condition`` is false.) So, the ``IdleTimer.alarm`` rule effectively checks whether ``busy`` has been false for more than ``idle_timeout`` seconds. If ``busy`` is currently true, then ``self.idle_for`` will be ``NOT_YET``, and subscripting ``NOT_YET`` always returns ``NOT_YET``. Since ``NOT_YET`` is a moment that can never be reached, the boolean value of the expression is always false while ``busy`` is true. Let's look at the ``IdleTimer`` in action:: >>> it = IdleTimer() >>> it.busy = True >>> Time.advance(30) # busy for 30 seconds >>> it.busy = False >>> Time.advance(10) # idle for 10 seconds, no timeout yet >>> Time.advance(10) # ...20 seconds! timed out! >>> Time.advance(15) # idle 35 seconds, no new timeout >>> it.busy = True # busy again >>> Time.advance(5) # for 5 seconds... >>> it.busy = False >>> Time.advance(30) # idle 30 seconds, timeout! timed out! >>> it.idle_timeout = 15 # already at 30, fires again timed out! >>> print Time.next_event_time() None Automatically Advancing the Time ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In our examples, we've been manually updating the time. But if ``auto_update`` is true, then the time automatically advances whenever a trellis value is changed:: >>> Time.auto_update = True >>> c = trellis.Cell() >>> c.value = 42 >>> now = Time[0] >>> from time import sleep >>> sleep(0.1) >>> now == Time[0] # time hasn't actually moved forward yet... True >>> c.value = 24 >>> now == Time[0] # but now it has, since a recalculation occurred False This ensures that any rules that use a current time value, or that are waiting for a timeout, will see the correct time. Note, however, that if your application doesn't change any trellis values for a long time, then any pending timeouts may not fire for an excessive period of time. You can, however, force an update to occur by using the ``Time.tick()`` method:: >>> now = Time[0] >>> sleep(0.1) >>> now == Time[0] # time hasn't actually moved forward yet... True >>> Time.tick() >>> now == Time[0] # but now it has! False So, an application's main loop can call ``Time.tick()`` repeatedly in order to ensure that any pending timeouts are being fired. You can reduce the number of ``tick()`` calls significantly, however, if you make use of the ``next_event_time()`` method. If there are no scheduled events pending, it returns ``None``:: >>> print Time.next_event_time() None But if anything is waiting, like say, our ``IdleTimeout`` object from the previous section, it returns the relative or absolute time of the next time ``tick()`` will need to be called:: >>> Time.auto_update = False >>> it = IdleTimer(idle_timeout=30) >>> Time.next_event_time(relative=True) 30.0 >>> when = activity.EPOCH[Time.next_event_time(relative=False)] >>> when - Time[0] 30.0 >>> Time.advance(30) timed out! (We can't show the absolute time in this example, because it would change every time this document was run. But we can offset it from the ``EPOCH``, and then subtract it from the current time, to prove that it's equal to an absolute time 30 seconds after the current time.) Armed with this method, you can now write code for your application's event loop that calls ``tick()`` at the appropriate interval. You will simply need to define a Trellis rule somewhere that monitors the ``next_event_time()`` and schedules a call to ``Time.tick()`` if the next event time is not None. You can use whatever scheduling mechanism your application already includes, such as a ``wx.Timer`` or Twisted's ``reactor.callLater``, etc. When the scheduled call to ``tick()`` occurs, your monitoring rule will be run again (because ``next_event_time()`` depends on the current time), thus repeating the cycle as often as necessary. Note, however, that your rule may be run again *before* the scheduled ``tick()`` occurs, and so may end up scheduling extra calls to ``tick()``. This should be harmless, however, but if you want to avoid the repeats you can always write your rule so that it updates the existing scheduled call time, if one is pending. (E.g. by updating the ``wx.Timer`` or changing the Twisted "appointment".) We'll talk more about the interaction between ``Time`` and event loops in the section on `Creating A Custom Event Loop`_. The Event Loop Service ====================== The ``activity.EventLoop`` service allows you to write components that will run under any event-driven framework that has an ``EventLoop`` implementation. It provides a framework-independent way to request that a function be called at an "idle" moment. (This mainly used to support `Co-operative Multitasking`_, as will be described in a later section.) ``EventLoop`` service instances have the following methods: call(`func`, `*args`, `**kw`) Call the given function at the next idle moment. What "idle" means depends on the specific event loop implementation, but it should generally mean "as soon as possible after all currently pending events/callbacks are processed". Callbacks are invoked in the exact order they are registered in. run() Run the event loop until ``stop()`` is called, or the event loop exits for some other reason. (Raises an error if the event loop is already running.) stop() Request that the event loop stop as soon as possible. Whether any outstanding ``call()`` callbacks are processed first is implementation- defined. poll() Try to run one outstanding ``call()`` callback, if one is pending. flush(`count=None`) Run up to `count` outstanding ``call()`` callbacks, if any are pending. If `count` is ``None``, run all pending callbacks. The ``poll()`` and ``flush()`` are mainly intended for your convenience when writing tests of code that would ordinarily be run inside an event loop. In other words, you'll generally use them in place of ``run()`` calls when testing your components. We'll see plenty of examples of this when we get to the section on `Co-operative Multitasking`_. Let's take a look at an example of using the default ``EventLoop`` implementation:: >>> def hello(*args, **kw): ... print "called with", args, kw >>> from peak.events.activity import EventLoop >>> EventLoop.call(hello, 1, a='b') >>> EventLoop.call(hello, 2) >>> EventLoop.call(hello, this=3) >>> EventLoop.call(EventLoop.stop) >>> EventLoop.run() called with (1,) {'a': 'b'} called with (2,) {} called with () {'this': 3} As you can see, the ``hello()`` function was called back three times with the various arguments we requested, then a call to the ``stop()`` method caused the ``run()`` to exit. But you can't stop an already stopped loop:: >>> EventLoop.stop() Traceback (most recent call last): ... AssertionError: EventLoop isn't running Or ``run()`` one that's already running:: >>> EventLoop.call(EventLoop.run) >>> EventLoop.run() Traceback (most recent call last): ... AssertionError: EventLoop is already running You can check an event loop's status using its ``running`` and ``stop_requested`` attributes, which are both normally false:: >>> @trellis.Performer ... def LoopWatch(): ... print "Running =", EventLoop.running ... print "Stopping =", EventLoop.stop_requested ... print "----------------" Running = False Stopping = False ---------------- >>> EventLoop.call(EventLoop.stop) >>> EventLoop.run() Running = True Stopping = False ---------------- Running = True Stopping = True ---------------- Running = False Stopping = False ---------------- >>> del LoopWatch # don't print this stuff out any more As you can see, the ``running`` attribute turns true once the event loop starts running. When ``stop()`` is called, the ``stop_requested`` attribute becomes true, and then both ``running`` and ``stop_requested`` return to their normal values. Alternate Event Loops (Twisted, wxPython, ...) ---------------------------------------------- Unless you have a relatively simple program or are writing tests, you probably won't use the default ``EventLoop`` implementation. More likely, you'll use something like the Twisted or wxPython event loops:: >>> from peak.events.activity import TwistedEventLoop, WXEventLoop You'll need to install the appropriate event loop service before your program makes any use of it (or else create a new service context; see the `Contextual docs`_ for more details). In the simplest cases this can be accomplished by adding a line like this near the beginning of your program:: activity.EventLoop <<= TwistedEventLoop This configures the ``EventLoop`` service to create a ``TwistedEventLoop`` in place of the default implementation. ``EventLoop`` API calls will then be routed to the Twisted reactor, as appropriate. Note that if you use the ``TwistedEventLoop``, you must first configure your desired reactor implementation before you use any ``EventLoop`` APIs. Similarly, if you use the ``WXEventLoop``, you must create your ``wx.App`` first. (If you are using both Twisted and wxPython in the same application, we suggest using Twisted's ``wxreactor`` with the ``TwistedEventLoop``.) If you need to use an event-driven framework other than Twisted or wxPython, and someone else hasn't already implemented an ``EventLoop`` service for it, you'll need to see the section on `Creating A Custom Event Loop`_ to find out how to roll your own. Co-operative Multitasking ========================= The Trellis allows for a limited form of co-operative multitasking, using generator functions. By declaring a generator function as a ``@task`` method, you can get it to run across multiple trellis recalculations, retaining its state along the way. For example:: >>> class TaskExample(trellis.Component): ... trellis.attrs( ... start = False, ... stop = False ... ) ... @activity.task ... def demo(self): ... print "waiting to start" ... while not self.start: ... yield activity.Pause ... print "starting" ... while not self.stop: ... print "waiting to stop" ... yield activity.Pause ... print "stopped" >>> t = TaskExample() >>> EventLoop.flush() # this wouldn't be needed if we were *in* the loop! waiting to start >>> t.start = True >>> EventLoop.flush() # this wouldn't be needed if we were *in* the loop! starting waiting to stop >>> t.stop = True >>> EventLoop.flush() # this wouldn't be needed if we were *in* the loop! stopped The ``@activity.task`` decorator is used to turn a generator function into a co-routine that will run as a semi-independent task. An ``activity.TaskCell`` will be created for the corresponding attribute when an instance of the enclosing class is created (unless you also use ``@trellis.optional`` to mark it as an optional attribute). When the ``TaskCell`` is created, an ``EventLoop.call()`` is used to request that the generator be iterated when possible. Each iteration of the generator is run as if it were a ``@modifier``; that is, the effects of changes made during one iteration of the generator will not be seen until a subsequent iteration. So the generator can yield a special ``activity.Pause`` in order to suspend itself until a cell it depends on has changed. In the above example, the task initially depends on the value of the ``start`` cell, so it is not resumed until ``start`` is set to ``True``. Then it prints "starting", and waits for ``self.stop`` to become true. We then set ``stop`` to true, which causes the loop to exit. The task is now finished, and any further changes will not re-invoke it. (By the way, notice that we had to call ``EventLoop.flush()`` a few times in order to advance the generator. That's because the generator is advanced via an ``EventLoop.call()`` that's registered whenever the conditions the generator depends on have changed. If this were a real application, running under ``EventLoop.run()``, we wouldn't need to do this since the callbacks would be flushed regularly. But when you test code like this example, you may wish to explicitly flush callbacks instead of trying to run an entire event loop before checking your results.) Invoking Subtasks ----------------- Tasks can invoke or "call" other generators by yielding them. For example, we can rewrite our example like this, for more modularity:: >>> class TaskExample(trellis.Component): ... trellis.attrs( ... start = False, ... stop = False ... ) ... ... def wait_for_start(self): ... print "waiting to start" ... while not self.start: ... yield activity.Pause ... ... def wait_for_stop(self): ... while not self.stop: ... print "waiting to stop" ... yield activity.Pause ... ... @activity.task ... def demo(self): ... yield self.wait_for_start() ... print "starting" ... yield self.wait_for_stop() ... print "stopped" >>> t = TaskExample() >>> EventLoop.flush() waiting to start >>> t.start = True >>> EventLoop.flush() starting waiting to stop >>> t.stop = True >>> EventLoop.flush() stopped Yielding a generator from a ``@task`` causes that generator to temporarily replace the main generator -- until the child generator returns, yields a non-``Pause`` value, or raises an exception. At that point, control returns to the "parent" generator. Subtasks may be nested to any depth. Receiving Values and Propagating Exceptions ------------------------------------------- If you are targeting Python 2.5 or higher, you don't need to do anything special to receive values yielded by subtasks, or to ensure that subtask exceptions are propagated. You can receive return values using expressions like:: result = yield someGenerator(someArgs) However, in earlier versions of Python, this syntax doesn't exist, so you must use the special ``activity.resume()`` function instead, e.g.:: yield someGenerator(someArgs); result = activity.resume() If you are writing code intended to run on Python 2.3 or 2.4 (as well as 2.5), you should always call ``activity.resume()`` immediately after a subtask invocation (preferably on the same line, as shown), *even if you don't need to get the result*. E.g.:: yield someGenerator(someArgs); activity.resume() The reason you should do this is that Python versions before 2.5 do not allow you to pass exceptions into a generator, so the Trellis can't cause the ``yield`` statement to propagate an error from ``someGenerator()``. If the subtask raised an exception, it will silently vanish unless the ``resume()`` function is called. The reason to put it on the same line as the yield is so that you can see the subtask call in the error's traceback, instead of just a line saying ``activity.resume()``! (Note, by the way, that it's perfectly valid to use ``activity.resume()`` in code that will *also* run under Python 2.5; it's just redundant unless the code will be used with older Python versions as well.) The ability to receive values from a subtask lets you create utility functions that wait for events to occur in some non-Trellis system. For example, you could create a function like this, to let you wait for a Twisted "deferred" to fire:: def wait_for(deferred): result = trellis.Cell(None, activity.Pause) deferred.addBoth(result.set_value) # firing will set the result cell while result.value is activity.Pause: yield activity.Pause if isinstance(result.value, failure.Failure): try: result.value.raiseException() finally: del result # get rid of the traceback reference cycle yield activity.Return(result.value) You would then use it like this (Python 2.5+ only):: result = yield wait_for(someTwistedFuncReturningADeferred(...)) Or like this (compatible with earlier Python versions):: yield wait_for(someTwistedFunc(...)); result = activity.resume() This example ``wait_for()`` function creates a cell and adds its ``set_value()`` method as a callback to the deferred, to receive either a value or an error. It then waits until the callback occurs, by yielding ``Pause`` objects. If the result is a Twisted ``Failure``, it raises the exception represented by the failure. Otherwise, it wraps the result in a ``activity.Return()`` and yields it to its calling task, where it will be received as the result of the ``yield`` expression (in Python 2.5+) or of the ``activity.resume()`` call (versions <2.5). How Tasks Really Work --------------------- Note, by the way, that when we say the generator above will "wait" until the callback occurs, we actually mean no such thing! What *really* happens is that this generator yields ``Pause``, recalculation finishes normally, and control is returned to whatever non-Trellis code caused a recalculation to occur in the first place. Then, later, when the deferred fires and a callback occurs to set the ``result`` cell's value, this *triggers a recalculation sweep*, in which an implementation rule uses ``EventLoop.call()`` to set up the generator to be resumed. The recalculation then finishes and control is returned to the code that caused the deferred to fire. Finally, when the event loop flushes its callbacks, the generator will actually be resumed. It then yields the result or raises an exception, which in either case is propagated back to whatever generator "called" it, which may then go on to do other things with the value or exception before it pauses or returns in its own turn. Thus, "time" in the Trellis (and especially for tasks) moves forward only when something *changes*. It's the setting of cell values that triggers recalculation sweeps, and tasks only resume after sweeps where one of their dependencies have changed. A task is considered to depend on any cells whose value it has read since the last time it (or a subtask) yielded a ``Pause``. Each time a task is resumed, its old dependencies are thrown out, and a new set are accumulated. A task must also ``Pause`` in order to see the effects of any changes it makes to trellis-managed data structures. For example:: >>> c = trellis.List([1,2]) >>> c [1, 2] >>> def demo_task(): ... c.append(3) ... print c ... yield activity.Pause ... print c >>> activity.TaskCell(demo_task).value >>> EventLoop.flush() [1, 2] >>> EventLoop.flush() [1, 2, 3] As you can see, modifying the list inside a task is like changing it inside a ``@modifier`` -- the change doesn't take effect until a new recalculation occurs, and the *current* recalculation can't finish until the task yields a ``Pause`` or returns (i.e., exits entirely). In this example, the task is resumed immediately after the pause because the task depended on ``c`` (by printing it), and its value *changed* in the subsequent sweep (because the task set it). So the task was resumed immediately, and scheduled to be run as soon as the event loop is flushed again. But what if a task doesn't have any dependencies? If it doesn't depend on anything, how does it get resumed after a pause? Let's see what happens:: >>> def demo_task(): ... print 1 ... yield activity.Pause ... print 2 >>> activity.TaskCell(demo_task).value >>> EventLoop.flush() 1 >>> EventLoop.flush() 2 As you can see, a task with no dependencies, (i.e., one that hasn't looked at any cells since its last ``Pause``), is automatically resumed. The Trellis effectively pretends that the task both set and depended on an imaginary cell, forcing the task to be scheduled for execution again. This prevents tasks from accidently suspending themselves indefinitely. Creating A Custom Event Loop ============================ There are quite a few event-driven application frameworks used with Python, including those of various GUI toolkits, co-operative multitasking frameworks, etc. If you need to integrate the trellis with one, it's fairly straightforward to wrap its API in an ``EventLoop`` implementation. Here are the attributes and methods you'll need to implement: _ticker This should be a ``@trellis.perform`` rule that only executes when the event loop is running, and handles scheduling for ``Time.tick()`` calls. When ``self._next_time`` is not ``None``, it is a value indicating the number of seconds until the next scheduled event, and you should arrange to call ``Time.tick()`` at that time, if possible. Also, if ``self.stop_requested`` is true, the observer should request that the real event loop exit, if it's currently running and hasn't already been asked to exit. _loop() This method should run the real event loop. _arrange_callback(`func`) Arrange for `func` to be called back with zero arguments when the real event loop is idle. _setup() Do any one-time setup that might be required before callbacks are arranged or the loop is run. Typically, this routine will import the targeted event loop API and do any configuration, or initialize any private attributes needed to implement the other methods. Let's take a look at an example implementation:: >>> from peak import context >>> class MyEventLoop(activity.EventLoop): ... context.replaces(activity.EventLoop) # <-- must have this line! ... ... @trellis.perform ... def _ticker(self): ... if self.running: ... if Time.auto_update: ... if self._next_time is not None: ... print "tick() needed after", self._next_time, "secs" ... if self.stop_requested: ... print "ask the event loop to exit now" ... ... def _loop(self): ... print "actually run the event loop here" ... ... def _arrange_callback(self, func): ... print "arrange to call back", func ... ... def _setup(self): ... print "do any setup here" >>> m = MyEventLoop() >>> m.call(hello, 'test 1') do any setup here arrange to call back <bound method MyEventLoop._callback ...> >>> m.call(hello, 'test 2') >>> m.run() actually run the event loop here ask the event loop to exit now This event loop implementation is actually a bit broken, because it doesn't really arrange for a callback in the ``_arrange_callback()`` method. If we had actually arranged for the callback to be called back by some external event loop API, our ``call()`` would have worked:: >>> m._callback() called with ('test 1',) {} arrange to call back <bound method MyEventLoop._callback ...> For more examples, check out the source code of the ``TwistedEventLoop`` and ``WXEventLoop`` classes in ``peak.events.activity``: they're both quite short.
cvs-admin@eby-sarna.com Powered by ViewCVS 1.0-dev |
ViewCVS and CVS Help |